Retired judges who did not express even the slightest condemnation..!
1. Direct Conflict with the Judiciary: Impeachment Motion – A Shocking Twist
The focus is on the impeachment motion against Justice G.R. Swaminathan. Thirumavalavan stated that he, along with 108 Members of Parliament from other opposition parties, has submitted a resolution to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha seeking the removal of the judge. He accused the judge of acting in favor of the Sangh Parivar organizations, and through this, he was not just criticizing an individual judge but launching an attack on an ideological network.
He pointed out that many retired judges who failed to express even minimal condemnation when a slipper was hurled at the Chief Justice of India, B.R. Gavai, are now publicly supporting G.R. Swaminathan.
"It is shocking that even those within the judiciary are aiding this. Especially Justice G.R. Swaminathan's stance, or the judgment he has delivered, his approach, is a cause for great concern."
2. Tiruparankundram Conspiracy: An Attempt to Disrupt Religious Harmony?
Thirumavalavan leveled a specific accusation against Sangh Parivar organizations regarding the Tiruparankundram issue. He mentioned that Hindus and Muslims have been living in peace and brotherhood in that area for many years.
He accused the Sangh Parivar organizations of "intentionally raising a non-existent issue" there and attempting to incite communal riots in Madurai. This is seen as a direct accusation that a problem is being deliberately manufactured with the aim of dividing society for political gain.
"The people of Tamil Nadu will never allow that. The people of Tamil Nadu will expose and drive out the mobs, and the BJP and RSS organizations, that support the Sangh Parivar."
3. Caste-based Census: Support and Political Criticism
Thirumavalavan articulated his nuanced stance on the demand for a caste-based census, particularly the initiative by the PMK. He clarified the VCK's principled support, stating, "We agree with the idea that a caste-based census should be conducted."
However, he also pointed out a key distinction. Only the one conducted by the Union Government of India is a "Census" as per the Constitution, while a survey conducted by a state government is merely a "Field Survey" (Kala-Aivu). Therefore, he argued that for this demand to be legally robust, it must be presented to the Union Government itself.
He criticized the PMK's current activities as merely a "political maneuver for elections" and posed a sharp question: "It is unclear why they are not ready to emphasize this demand to the Union Government of India." This question reinforces his argument that the PMK's struggle is not aimed at the Union Government, which can effect real change, but is a tactic to create an impact in the Tamil Nadu political arena.
4. Calm within the Alliance: VCK's Unhurried Strategy
Thirumavalavan's perspective on alliance dynamics was completely different from the political hustle. He stated there was "no urgency" to receive applications (from candidates) so far in advance.
He clarified the VCK's process, stating that negotiations with the DMK would be held at the appropriate time, and applications would only be sought after the constituencies have been confirmed.